[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080312144701.GZ15804@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:47:01 -0400
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, "Fred ." <eldmannen@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Keys get stuck
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 09:14:56PM +1030, David Newall wrote:
> It should be said that X implements auto-repeat out of necessity. While
> the kernel can report key down and up events, its further interpretation
> of those events is not appropriate. Many combinations of events are
> possible, such as keyboard plus mouse, and this precludes the kernel
> from providing a full interpretation. It would be wrong for it to even
> try. X is the proper place to implement auto-repeat for X.
The problem is that under heavy load the auto-repeat problem is real;
I've seen it as well, and it means that I've started to try to avoid
"make -j4" since that's a great way to trigger it.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists