[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0803121055510.4595-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:01:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Huang, Ying wrote:
> I think "kexec based hibernation" is the only currently available
> possible method to write out image without freezer (after driver works
> are done). If other process is running, how to prevent them from writing
> to disk without freezing them in current implementation?
This is a very good question.
It's a matter of managing the block layer's request queues. Somehow
the existing I/O requests must remain blocked while the requests needed
for writing the image must be allowed to proceed.
I don't know what would be needed to make this work, but it ought to be
possible somehow...
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists