lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080312151452.GA4523@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:14:52 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To:	Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
Cc:	Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>,
	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PNP: increase the maximum number of resources

In commit a7839e960675b549f06209d18283d5cee2ce9261 the number of PNP resources
was increased.  In testing, we've found that the 'exceeded' warnings still get
hit with quite high frequency. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436589
for examples.

I added the debug patch below, which yielded an interesting output.

pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem resources. Max:12 Found:12

off by one somewhere ?

	Dave

diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
index 6aa231e..0c22e41 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_irqresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
 		i++;
 	if (i >= PNP_MAX_IRQ && !warned) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IRQ "
-				"resources: %d \n", PNP_MAX_IRQ);
+				"resources. Max:%d Found:%d\n", PNP_MAX_IRQ, i);
 		warned = 1;
 		return;
 	}
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_dmaresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
 		res->dma_resource[i].end = dma;
 	} else if (!warned) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of DMA "
-				"resources: %d \n", PNP_MAX_DMA);
+				"resources. Max:%d Found:%d\n", PNP_MAX_DMA, i);
 		warned = 1;
 	}
 }
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_ioresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
 		res->port_resource[i].end = io + len - 1;
 	} else if (!warned) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of IO "
-				"resources: %d \n", PNP_MAX_PORT);
+				"resources. Max:%d Found:%d\n", PNP_MAX_PORT, i);
 		warned = 1;
 	}
 }
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_memresource(struct pnp_resource_table *res,
 		res->mem_resource[i].end = mem + len - 1;
 	} else if (!warned) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "pnpacpi: exceeded the max number of mem "
-				"resources: %d\n", PNP_MAX_MEM);
+				"resources. Max:%d Found:%d\n", PNP_MAX_MEM, i);
 		warned = 1;
 	}
 }
-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ