linux-kernel - [PATCH resend] isd200: Allocate sense_buffer for hacked up scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47D7F5A3.9010004@panasas.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:24:19 +0200
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
	Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@...ckframe.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH resend] isd200: Allocate sense_buffer for hacked up scsi_cmnd

On Wed, Mar 12 2008 at 17:10 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> 
>> Since the separation of sense_buffer from scsi_cmnd, Drivers that hack their
>> own struct scsi_cmnd like here isd200, must also take care of their own
>> sense_buffer.
> 
> Did you run this through checkpatch?
> 
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> 
> Alan Stern
> 
> --
No I did not, Thanks. Here it is again. 
Again this is for 2.6.25 rc-fixes a NULL dereference bugfix!
 
---
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:23:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] isd200: Allocate sense_buffer for hacked up scsi_cmnd

Since the separation of sense_buffer from scsi_cmnd, Drivers that hack their
own struct scsi_cmnd like here isd200, must also take care of their own
sense_buffer.

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
---
 drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
index 2ae1e86..ac1764b 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
@@ -294,6 +294,7 @@ struct isd200_info {
 	unsigned char MaxLUNs;
 	struct scsi_cmnd srb;
 	struct scatterlist sg;
+	u8 *sense_buffer;
 };
 
 
@@ -1469,6 +1470,7 @@ static void isd200_free_info_ptrs(void *info_)
 	if (info) {
 		kfree(info->id);
 		kfree(info->RegsBuf);
+		kfree(info->sense_buffer);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1494,11 +1496,13 @@ static int isd200_init_info(struct us_data *us)
 				kzalloc(sizeof(struct hd_driveid), GFP_KERNEL);
 		info->RegsBuf = (unsigned char *)
 				kmalloc(sizeof(info->ATARegs), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf) {
+		info->sense_buffer = kmalloc(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf || !info->sense_buffer) {
 			isd200_free_info_ptrs(info);
 			kfree(info);
 			retStatus = ISD200_ERROR;
-		}
+		} else
+			info->srb.sense_buffer = info->sense_buffer;
 	}
 
 	if (retStatus == ISD200_GOOD) {
-- 
1.5.3.3


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/