[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803120934360.30443@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signals: send_signal: be paranoid about signalfd_notify()
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> send_signal() shouldn't call signalfd_notify() if it then fails with -EAGAIN.
> Harmless, just a paranoid cleanup.
>
> Also remove the comment. It is obsolete, signalfd_notify() was simplified and
> does a simple wakeup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Looks fine to me.
Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
>
> --- 25/kernel/signal.c~3_SS_NOTIFY 2008-03-12 15:16:52.000000000 +0300
> +++ 25/kernel/signal.c 2008-03-12 15:55:47.000000000 +0300
> @@ -769,13 +769,6 @@ static int send_signal(int sig, struct s
> */
> if (legacy_queue(pending, sig))
> return 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Deliver the signal to listening signalfds. This must be called
> - * with the sighand lock held.
> - */
> - signalfd_notify(t, sig);
> -
> /*
> * fast-pathed signals for kernel-internal things like SIGSTOP
> * or SIGKILL.
> @@ -825,6 +818,7 @@ static int send_signal(int sig, struct s
> }
>
> out_set:
> + signalfd_notify(t, sig);
> sigaddset(&pending->signal, sig);
> complete_signal(sig, t, group);
> return 0;
>
- Davide
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists