[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803121748140.15209@jikos.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:49:22 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, "Fred ." <eldmannen@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Keys get stuck
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, David Newall wrote:
> > The problem is that under heavy load the auto-repeat problem is real;
> > I've seen it as well, and it means that I've started to try to avoid
> > "make -j4" since that's a great way to trigger it.
> I'm sure it does suck under heavy load, although I suppose you could
> increase the start time. But I wonder if that is the problem this
> time? Modern machines are so damned fast they actually take real effort
> to load. Actually, "make -j4" doesn't sound particularly heavy.
> There's huge disk i/o in a make. Plenty of scheduling opportunities.
> Obviously I only know what everybody else here knows; but with so many
> recent posts suggesting a scheduling fault has been introduced, I'm
> expecting it to be that.
The problem became much more apparent during early -rc phase of 2.6.25 for
those people that have CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED turned on. This clearly shows
that X are somehow unhappy with how kernel schedules them, but I don't
have idea how autorepeat is implemented inside X and what could be the
problem right now.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists