linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 kernel panic with "Exception: 501 " on powerpc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080312175102.GC613@parisc-linux.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:02 -0600
From:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 kernel panic with "Exception: 501 " on powerpc

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:46:45AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:25:37 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Beats me.  Maybe we're still enabling interrupts too early.  But the new
> semaphore code got fixed (didn't it?)

On the 7th, according to my records.  Easy to check -- look in
kernel/semaphore.c and see whether down() is using spin_lock_irqsave
(good) or spin_lock_irq (bad).

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/