lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:30:53 -0700 From: Max Krasnyanskiy <maxk@...lcomm.com> To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com> CC: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, mingo@...e.hu, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: boot cgroup questions Paul Jackson wrote: > Paul M wrote: >> Not cgroups, no. If you really wanted to extend cpusets specifically >> to allow irqs to be assigned to a cpuset to control which cpus they >> could execute on, then that might be a possibility. But I don't see >> how this would be useful for any other cgroup subsystem, so it doesn't >> belong in the generic framework. > > Ok - a sensible decision. > >> My feeling is that just using a simple bitmask assignment, unrelated >> to cpusets or cgroups, as Max suggested in his later email is the way >> to go. > > I'll have to have another go at reading his replies. I seem to have > more difficulty making sense of his posts ... not sure why. I'm sure it's because of gazillion typos in them :). Max -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists