[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D8304C.3090005@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:34:36 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Bob Tracy <rct@...s.com>
CC: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
ALSA devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, Krzysztof Helt <krzysztof.h1@...pl>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [regression] 2.6.25-rc4 snd-es18xx broken on Alpha
On 12-03-08 15:40, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Well, I built a 2.6.22 kernel last night, and in tests this morning
> there's no difference relative to the ALSA behavior seen in 2.6.25-rc4.
Okay. If someone is tracking this as a 2.6.25 regresion, it can be stricken
of that list.
> Since the question came up (or was strongly implied), I took the time to
> check the status of IRQ 5 in /proc/interrupts, and while it shows up as
> assigned to the sound card, no interrupts are being seen/processed by
> the es18xx driver.
That is indeed what it soundeed like, or the first bit at least.
> When I remove the snd-es18xx module and install the snd-sb8 module with
> the same parameters (other than there's no second DMA channel), the
> /proc/interrupts counter for IRQ 5 increments as expected when playing
> sound files.
What does cat /proc/config.gz | grep CONFIG_ALPHA_ say? Miuchael, and for
you? For some Alpha configs, arch/alpha/kernel/es1888.c is compiled and for
some not. I expect for you (Bob) it's compiled in? And Michael?
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists