linux-kernel - Re: [patch 6/6] Guest page hinting: s390 support.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47D84CEB.6050300@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:36:43 -0700
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, akpm@...l.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, frankeh@...son.ibm.com,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [patch 6/6] Guest page hinting: s390 support.

Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Vp should never happen, since you'd never preserve a V page.  And 
>> surely it would be Pr -> Sr, since the hypervisor wouldn't push the 
>> page to backing store when you change the client state.
>>     
>
> You're right, I meant Vp/Pp but they are invalid states.  I think one of 
> the things that keeps tripping me up is that the host can change both 
> the host and guest page states.  My initial impression was that the host 
> handled the host state and the guest handled the guest state.
>   

Yes.  And it seems to me that you get unfortunate outcomes if you have a 
Pr->Vz->Vr transition.

>>> Do the host states even really need visibility to the guest at all?  
>>> It may be useful for the guest to be able to distinguish between Ur 
>>> and Uz but it doesn't seem necessary.
>>>       
>> Well, you implicitly see the hypervisor state.  If you touch a [UV]z 
>> page then you get a fault telling you that the page has been taken 
>> away from you (I think).  And it would definitely help with debugging 
>> (seems likely there's lots of scope for race conditions if you 
>> prematurely tell the hypervisor you don't need the page any more...).
>>     
>
> I was thinking that it may be useful to know a Ur verses a Uz when 
> allocating memory.  In this case, you'd rather allocate Ur pages verses 
> Uz to avoid the fault.  I don't read s390 arch code well, is the host 
> state explicit to the guest?
>   

Yes, reusing Ur pages might well be better, but who knows - they've 
probably got an instruction which makes Uz cheap...

Stuff like this suggets that both parts of the state are packed 
together, and are guest-visible:

+	return (state & ESSA_USTATE_MASK) == ESSA_USTATE_VOLATILE &&
+		(state & ESSA_CSTATE_MASK) == ESSA_CSTATE_ZERO;


      J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/