linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 8/6] signals: send_signal: factor out SIGNAL_GROUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080312220824.GA120@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:08:24 +0300
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/6] signals: send_signal: factor out SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT checks

On 03/12, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > Of course, since I personally don't agree, I'd like to discuss it more
> > if possible.
> 
> The point is that, whenever possible, a semantics change should be
> isolated into a patch separate from any related cleanups.  More
> important than that, no semantics change should go unmentioned so
> it's only documented as a result of someone's careful review of
> the change.

Yes. You are very right.

And. I must admit. I didn't even realize that the added semantics change
worth at least a special note in changelog because it is easily visible.
This was really wrong in any case. Thanks for pointing out this.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/