[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803122354.27484.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:54:26 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: pm_register() and pm_send_all()
On Wednesday, 12 of March 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> This:
>
> kernel/power/pm.c:203: warning: 'pm_register' is deprecated (declared at kernel/power/pm.c:62)
> kernel/power/pm.c:203: warning: 'pm_register' is deprecated (declared at kernel/power/pm.c:62)
> kernel/power/pm.c:204: warning: 'pm_send_all' is deprecated (declared at kernel/power/pm.c:178)
> kernel/power/pm.c:204: warning: 'pm_send_all' is deprecated (declared at kernel/power/pm.c:178)
>
> is getting a bit boring. These were marked deprecated at least three years
> ago.
>
>
> pm_register() no longer has any callers and afacit can be removed
> immediately.
>
> pm_send_all() has just a handful of callers:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c
> arch/mips/au1000/common/power.c
> arch/frv/kernel/pm.c
>
> could we please get a bit of a push on this? How should these
> pm_send_all() calls be replaced?
Well, I was going to do that some time ago, but I'm not really familiar with
the old code. Some assistance would be welcome.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists