[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D8661A.4090809@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:24:10 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: David Moore <dcm@....EDU>
CC: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@...hat.com>,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: fw-ohci: sync AT dma buffer before use
David Moore wrote:
> 1. The dma_sync should probably be done before the context_append
> because the controller could in theory start reading the data as soon as
> context_append is called right?
Yes, but its syncing is superfluous anyway, as mentioned in the other
post. *If* it is doing something for Jarod's setup, then only because
of side effects like memory barrier properties.
> 2. As an optimization, we should attempt to allocate the payload in the
> lower 32-bits of physical memory, to prevent extra memcopies on x86_64.
> I think this can be done by adding GFP_DMA32 to kmalloc where the
> payload was allocated in fw-cdev.c. There might be other places where
> we would benefit from GFP_DMA32 also. Of course, these optimizations
> are probably better saved for another patch.
I think so too. GFP_DMA32 would be appropriate on machines with
"software IOMMU" alias swiotlb.
Does GFP_DMA32 have adverse affects on machines with a real IOMMU?
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --== -==--
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists