[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080312233709.GA25530@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:37:09 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: pcibios_scanned needs to be set in ACPI? (was Re: 2.6.25-rc5:
Reported regressions from 2.6.24)
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:32:48AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > It oopses at shutdown? I thought this was originally reported as a
> > "will not power off" which for a while was attributed to the cpufreq fix
> > that went into -rc2 or -rc3.
>
> As I already replied to Linus, no, it doesn't.
>
> > It would be interesting to see if reverting the pci_bus patch did
> > anything about the fact that we register the root PCI bus through two
> > different methods.
>
> You mean this: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120483340622706&w=2
Yes, the warnings go away as there is no more struct device to register,
but the big "PCI:" messages from the syslog at startup with the patch
reverted is what I am curious about.
I'll test more in a few hours, have to go herd the kids off to piano
lessons...
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists