[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47D74D0E.8090308@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 23:25:02 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genhd must_check warning fix
Roland McGrath wrote:
> Fixes:
>
> block/genhd.c:361: warning: ignoring return value of ‘class_register’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
> ---
> block/genhd.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> index c44527d..00da521 100644
> --- a/block/genhd.c
> +++ b/block/genhd.c
> @@ -360,7 +360,9 @@ static struct kobject *base_probe(dev_t devt, int *part, void *data)
>
> static int __init genhd_device_init(void)
> {
> - class_register(&block_class);
> + int error = class_register(&block_class);
> + if (unlikely(error))
> + return error;
> bdev_map = kobj_map_init(base_probe, &block_class_lock);
> blk_dev_init();
ACK
I was silly and simply tuned out this warning, assuming [wrongly] that
it was difficult to fix like the fs/partitions.c warning.
Shows how "helpful" those warnings are...
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists