[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080311223522.3326b6ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:35:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Holger Macht <hmacht@...e.de>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen.c.accardi@...el.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: Set flag DOCK_UNDOCKING when triggered via sysfs
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 01:07:27 +0100 Holger Macht <hmacht@...e.de> wrote:
> begin_undock() is only called when triggered via a acpi notify handler
> (pressing the undock button on the dock station), but complete_undock() is
> always called after the eject. So if a undock is triggered through a sysfs
> write, the flag DOCK_UNDOCKING has to be set for the dock station,
> too. Otherwise this will freeze the system hard.
>
We prefer not to make systems freeze hard.
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> index 307cef6..fa44fb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
> @@ -710,6 +710,7 @@ static ssize_t write_undock(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> if (!count)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + begin_undock(dock_station);
> ret = handle_eject_request(dock_station, ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST);
> return ret ? ret: count;
> }
I assume that this is needed in 2.6.24.x as well?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists