lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080313162454.3859ef1a@hskinnemo-gx620.norway.atmel.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:24:54 +0100
From:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-fbdev-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@...il.com>,
	ARM Linux Mailing List 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
	Sedji GAOUAOU <sedji.gaouaou@...el.com>,
	Patrice VILCHEZ <patrice.vilchez@...el.com>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atmel_lcdfb: suspend/resume support

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:51:56 +0100
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:

> +static int atmel_lcdfb_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t mesg)
> +{
> +	struct fb_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +	struct atmel_lcdfb_info *sinfo = info->par;
> +
> +	sinfo->saved_lcdcon = lcdc_readl(sinfo, ATMEL_LCDC_CONTRAST_VAL);

You're saving CONTRAST_VAL into a field called saved_lcdcon even though
it has nothing to do with LCDCON1 or LCDCON2...

> +	lcdc_writel(sinfo, ATMEL_LCDC_CONTRAST_CTR, 0);

...then you're altering CONTRAST_CTR...

> +}
> +
> +static int atmel_lcdfb_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{

> +	lcdc_writel(sinfo, ATMEL_LCDC_CONTRAST_CTR, sinfo->saved_lcdcon);

...and later restoring the saved value of CONTRAST_VAL into CONTRAST_CTR.

Confused.

> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct atmel_lcdfb_info {
>  	u8			bl_power;
>  #endif
>  	bool			lcdcon_is_backlight;
> +	u8			saved_lcdcon;

All of the registers involved are 32 bits wide, although the
interesting bits are all in the low byte. Do we really want to save
three bytes in the struct that badly?

Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ