lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803131102u79fcc774j440eef4356083b56@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:02:35 -0700
From:	"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Mel Gorman" <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
	"kernel list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: allocate section_map for sparse_init

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 4:19 AM, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> On (12/03/08 10:51), Yinghai Lu didst pronounce:
>
>
> > [PATCH] mm: allocate section_map for sparse_init
>  >
>  > allocate section_map in bootmem instead of using __initdata.
>  >
>  > need to apply it after
>  >         [PATCH] mm: fix boundary checking in free_bootmem_core
>  >         [PATCH] mm: make mem_map allocation continuous.
>  >
>  >
>  > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
>
>  > Index: linux-2.6/mm/sparse.c
>  > ===================================================================
>  > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/sparse.c
>  > +++ linux-2.6/mm/sparse.c
>  > @@ -285,8 +285,6 @@ struct page __init *sparse_early_mem_map
>  >       return NULL;
>  >  }
>  >
>  > -/* section_map pointer array is 64k */
>  > -static __initdata struct page *section_map[NR_MEM_SECTIONS];
>  >  /*
>  >   * Allocate the accumulated non-linear sections, allocate a mem_map
>  >   * for each and record the physical to section mapping.
>  > @@ -296,6 +294,9 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
>  >       unsigned long pnum;
>  >       struct page *map;
>  >       unsigned long *usemap;
>  > +     struct page **section_map;
>  > +     int size;
>  > +     int node;
>  >
>  >       /*
>  >        * map is using big page (aka 2M in x86 64 bit)
>  > @@ -305,13 +306,17 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
>  >        * then in big system, the memmory will have a lot hole...
>  >        * here try to allocate 2M pages continously.
>  >        */
>  > +     size = sizeof(struct page *) * NR_MEM_SECTIONS;
>  > +     section_map = alloc_bootmem(size);
>  > +     if (!section_map)
>  > +             panic("can not allocate section_map\n");
>  > +
>  >       for (pnum = 0; pnum < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; pnum++) {
>  >               if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
>  >                       continue;
>  >               section_map[pnum] = sparse_early_mem_map_alloc(pnum);
>  >       }
>  >
>  > -
>  >       for (pnum = 0; pnum < NR_MEM_SECTIONS; pnum++) {
>  >               if (!present_section_nr(pnum))
>  >                       continue;
>  > @@ -327,6 +332,9 @@ void __init sparse_init(void)
>  >               sparse_init_one_section(__nr_to_section(pnum), pnum, map,
>  >                                                               usemap);
>  >       }
>  > +
>  > +     for_each_online_node(node)
>  > +             free_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(node), __pa(section_map), size);
>
>  Why are you iterating every online node here instead of just calling
>  free_bootmem(__pa(section_map), size) ?

free_bootmem will assume use bdata on NODE_DATA(0).

some cases: four nodes system: only have memory installed for node 1,
and node 3.
alloc_bootmem will loop to get bootmem from node1, because there is no
ram node0, and not NODE_DATA(0) ...

we may update free_bootmem to loop all bdata or all online nodes to
call free_bootmem_core...

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ