[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803131210x5c2d826qe73b6ed37af2d835@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:10:58 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, clameter@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ak@...e.de, y-goto@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: make free_bootmem to loop bdata_list
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:53:31 -0700
> "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > [PATCH] mm: make free_bootmem to loop bdata_list
> >
> > [PATCH] mm: fix boundary checking in free_bootmem_core
> >
> > make the free_bootmem_core could handle out of range case. we could use
> > bdata_list to make sure the range can be freed for sure.
> >
> > so next time, we don't need to loop online nodes and could use
> > free_bootmem directly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
> >
>
> What is the relationship (if any) between this and
> mm-fix-boundary-checking-in-free_bootmem_core.patch?
after mm-fix-boundary-checking-in-free_bootmem_core.patch, or you can
fold this into that.
>
> Do you believe ths new patch is needed in 2.6.25 and if so, why?
could solve some free_bootmem in extreme case like no ram on node 0.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists