linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH ver3] isd200: Allocate sense_buffer for hacked up scsi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1205439413.2893.49.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:16:53 -0500
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	mdharm-usb@...-eyed-alien.net, svens@...ckframe.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH ver3] isd200: Allocate sense_buffer for hacked up
	scsi_cmnd

On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 13:01 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:20:09 +0200
> Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Since the separation of sense_buffer from scsi_cmnd, Drivers that hack their
> > own struct scsi_cmnd like here isd200, must also take care of their own
> > sense_buffer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c |    5 ++++-
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
> > index 4f2d143..971d13d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/isd200.c
> > @@ -1470,6 +1470,7 @@ static void isd200_free_info_ptrs(void *info_)
> >  	if (info) {
> >  		kfree(info->id);
> >  		kfree(info->RegsBuf);
> > +		kfree(info->srb.sense_buffer);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -1495,7 +1496,9 @@ static int isd200_init_info(struct us_data *us)
> >  				kzalloc(sizeof(struct hd_driveid), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  		info->RegsBuf = (unsigned char *)
> >  				kmalloc(sizeof(info->ATARegs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -		if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf) {
> > +		info->srb.sense_buffer =
> > +				kmalloc(SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +		if (!info->id || !info->RegsBuf || !info->srb.sense_buffer) {
> >  			isd200_free_info_ptrs(info);
> >  			kfree(info);
> >  			retStatus = ISD200_ERROR;
> 
> I've thoroughly lost the plot here.

Don't worry ... that's why life gave us SCSI maintainers ...

>   Is this needed in 2.6.25?  If so, why?

Yes.  Because the changes that separate the sense buffer from the
commmand allocation which cause this bug went in in the merge window for
2.6.25

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/