linux-kernel - [PATCH] net/lockdep: Make nl_table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080313035041.GA23325@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:20:41 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH] net/lockdep: Make nl_table_lock read acquire softirq safe.

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 01:09:22PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> =========================================================
> [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
> 2.6.25-rc4-sched-devel.git #56
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/0 just changed the state of lock:
>  (&rt_hash_locks[i]){-+..}, at: [<ffffffff804721ac>] rt_intern_hash+0x8c/0x3b0
> but this lock took another, soft-read-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
>  (fib_hash_lock){-.-?}
> 
> and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
> 
> 

I found one more of these during the bootup.

It appears as though rwlocks totally missed lockdep validation because
of jumping their dependency chains!

-->

   From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
   
   net: Make nl_table_lock read acquire softirq safe.

    =========================================================
    [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
    2.6.25-rc3 #61
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    swapper/0 just changed the state of lock:
     (&tb->tb6_lock){-+..}, at: [<c049a5ab>] __ip6_ins_rt+0x1e/0x3c
    but this lock took another, soft-read-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
     (nl_table_lock){..-?}
    
    and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
    
    Full lockdep report at
    http://gautham.shenoy.googlepages.com/nl_table_lock_irq_inversion.log
    
    This patch fixes the problem by making the read acquire of nl_table_lock
    softirq safe.
    
    Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
    Cc: Peter Ziljstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
    Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
    Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 1ab0da2..7ade317 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@ netlink_lock_table(void)
 {
 	/* read_lock() synchronizes us to netlink_table_grab */
 
-	read_lock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_lock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 	atomic_inc(&nl_table_users);
-	read_unlock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_unlock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 }
 
 static inline void
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static inline struct sock *netlink_lookup(struct net *net, int protocol,
 	struct sock *sk;
 	struct hlist_node *node;
 
-	read_lock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_lock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 	head = nl_pid_hashfn(hash, pid);
 	sk_for_each(sk, node, head) {
 		if ((sk->sk_net == net) && (nlk_sk(sk)->pid == pid)) {
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static inline struct sock *netlink_lookup(struct net *net, int protocol,
 	}
 	sk = NULL;
 found:
-	read_unlock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_unlock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 	return sk;
 }
 
@@ -1078,12 +1078,12 @@ void netlink_set_err(struct sock *ssk, u32 pid, u32 group, int code)
 	info.group = group;
 	info.code = code;
 
-	read_lock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_lock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 
 	sk_for_each_bound(sk, node, &nl_table[ssk->sk_protocol].mc_list)
 		do_one_set_err(sk, &info);
 
-	read_unlock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_unlock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 }
 
 /* must be called with netlink table grabbed */
@@ -1776,7 +1776,7 @@ static struct sock *netlink_seq_socket_idx(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t pos)
 static void *netlink_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
 	__acquires(nl_table_lock)
 {
-	read_lock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_lock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 	return *pos ? netlink_seq_socket_idx(seq, *pos - 1) : SEQ_START_TOKEN;
 }
 
@@ -1825,7 +1825,7 @@ static void *netlink_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 static void netlink_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
 	__releases(nl_table_lock)
 {
-	read_unlock(&nl_table_lock);
+	read_unlock_bh(&nl_table_lock);
 }
 
 
-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/