[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080313155315.6eb9942e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:53:15 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linuxram@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] vfs: mountinfo update
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:26:41 +0100
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Here are several updates to the /proc/<pid>/mountinfo patch by Ram and
> me. These hopefully address all comments by you, Al and others.
>
diffstat for all seven patches is:
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 35 +++++
fs/dcache.c | 101 +++++++++++---
fs/namespace.c | 182 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
fs/pnode.c | 131 ++++++++++++++++++-
fs/pnode.h | 15 +-
fs/proc/base.c | 121 +++++++++--------
fs/seq_file.c | 92 +++++++++++--
include/linux/dcache.h | 5
include/linux/mnt_namespace.h | 12 +
include/linux/mount.h | 2
include/linux/seq_file.h | 7 +
11 files changed, 559 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
that's a mountain of tricksy new core-kernel code just for some /proc file.
Is this all really justifiable?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists