[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47DA97DF.6010008@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:21:03 -0700
From: David Wilder <dwilder@...ibm.com>
To: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@...ibm.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wilder@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: blktrace/relay/s390: Oops in subbuf_splice_actor
Christof Schmitt wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 02:10:07PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 14 2008, Christof Schmitt wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:58:03PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> That is indeed a bug, does this work for you?
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/relay.c b/kernel/relay.c
>>>> index d080b9d..39d1fa8 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/relay.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/relay.c
>>>> @@ -1066,7 +1066,7 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
>>>> unsigned int flags,
>>>> int *nonpad_ret)
>>>> {
>>>> - unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, ret;
>>>> + unsigned int pidx, poff, total_len, subbuf_pages, nr_pages, ret;
>>>> struct rchan_buf *rbuf = in->private_data;
>>>> unsigned int subbuf_size = rbuf->chan->subbuf_size;
>>>> uint64_t pos = (uint64_t) *ppos;
>>>> @@ -1098,7 +1098,9 @@ static int subbuf_splice_actor(struct file *in,
>>>> pidx = (read_start / PAGE_SIZE) % subbuf_pages;
>>>> poff = read_start & ~PAGE_MASK;
>>>>
>>>> - for (total_len = 0; spd.nr_pages < subbuf_pages; spd.nr_pages++) {
>>>> + nr_pages = min_t(unsigned int, subbuf_pages, PIPE_BUFFERS);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (total_len = 0; spd.nr_pages < nr_pages; spd.nr_pages++) {
>>>> unsigned int this_len, this_end, private;
>>>> unsigned int cur_pos = read_start + total_len;
>>> With the patch, i can run dd and 'blktrace -h traceserver' without the
>>> oops. But the output from blktrace only contains only zeros and no
>>> usable data for blkparse. Using blktrace to write the data directly to
>>> disk, without using the blktrace server works. Is there anything i
>>> should look for to help debugging the problem?
>> We should probably get Tom in the loop, as he is the relay expert. I'll
>> make sure the above patch gets into 2.6.25, as it is definitely a bug
>> that needs fixing.
>
> http://relayfs.sourceforge.net/contact.html mentions Tom Zanussi, but
> his email address seems to be no longer valid. I copy Dave Wilder
> here, since he is mentioned as relay maintainer on the web page.
>
> Dave, can you have a look at this? I can easily reproduce the problem
> on s390 Linux for testing and getting more debug information.
>
> Christof
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
I will take a look at the problem.
Any thing special about the test you are running I need to know?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists