linux-kernel - Re: Poor PostgreSQL scaling on Linux 2.6.25-rc5 (vs 2.6.22)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47DA9CDB.2090707@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:42:19 +0100
From:	Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor PostgreSQL scaling on Linux 2.6.25-rc5 (vs 2.6.22)

Cyrus Massoumi wrote:

> FreeBSD does not outperform Linux, it's actually a bit faster according 
> to Nick's tests.
> 
> I cannot comment on BIND and NSD, but SPECjbb looks pretty close and the 
> bad ebizzy performance seems to be an issue with glibc's memory allocator.

DNS test was a request from BIND team:
*BIND 9 performance while serving large zones under update*
<http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/ISC-TN-2008-1.html>

more tests FreeBSD vs. LiNUX at http://jeffr-tech.livejournal.com/

-thanks-

regards,
-- 
so much to do, so little time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/