| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:30:49 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Romano Giannetti <romanol@...omillas.es> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, rjw@...k.pl, len.brown@...el.com, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: fix aperture vs. suspend problem On Fri 2008-03-14 09:14:23, Romano Giannetti wrote: > > > On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 23:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Thu 2008-03-13 15:32:48, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > [...] > > > This is also needed in 2.6.24, perhaps earlier? > > > > It seems to only trigger on >3GB boxes, during swsusp. People are not > > normally suspending those big boxes. I do not think this is worth > > backporting. > > Here vendors are starting to sell x86_64 laptops with 4GB ram in the > *default* configuration --- so I think that yes, it should be > backported, at least to 2.6.24 (which will be heavily shipped by distros > this year, I suppose). Ok, if you hit the problem, you can do the backport. Subject is wrong, it hits hibernation, not suspend (sorry), and I'm not yet sure if I fixed all the related problems. Testing welcome. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists