linux-kernel - Re: K8, EFFICEON and CORE2 support the cmovxx instructions.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Mar 2008 22:11:25 +0100
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...lshack.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: K8, EFFICEON and CORE2 support the cmovxx instructions.

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:06:32PM +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote:
> > > I'm quite sure that K8, EFFICEON and CORE2 support HAVE_CMOV, but
> > > they did not set X86_CMOV.
> > > 
> > 
> > Crusoe has CMOV as well.

So does GEODE_LX BTW

> I believe you... and the Makefile_32.cpu: it gets a -march=i686. I
> also found out that I missed X86_ELAN, which is treated as a i486.
> 
> Also, MGEODE_LX does not get any optimization flags. I think that
> is unintentional, but what should they be?

in my experience (on user-space code), optimizing for "i586" gives
good results. However, the cache is small, so everything which can
reduce code size (especially loop/jump/function alignment) is worth
checking.

Regards,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/