linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] Remove current_tick

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803150429500.1791@scrub.home>
Date:	Sat, 15 Mar 2008 04:32:27 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] Remove current_tick_length()

Hi,

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, john stultz wrote:

> On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 19:40 +0100, zippel@...ux-m68k.org wrote:
> > plain text document attachment (tick_length)
> > current_tick_length used to do a little more, but now it just returns
> > tick_length, which we can also access directly at the few places, where
> > it's needed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
> 
> Hrm. I'm not sure I like using a global variable instead of using an
> accessor function. At least with the accessor function folks couldn't
> just tweak the value outside ntp as easily.

Why would someone do something silly like this?

> Is there any additional rational for this change?

Useless bloat?

bye, Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/