linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] ntp.c code flow clenaups (from Ingo)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1205557496.6173.2.camel@jstultz-laptop>
Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:04:56 -0700
From:	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5]  ntp.c code flow clenaups  (from Ingo)


On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 05:52 +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, john stultz wrote:
> 
> > +static inline void process_adjtimex_adj_offset(struct timex *txc, long sec)
> 
> Somewhat ugly name...

Oh, that's a mis-merge. Thanks for catching it. The name should have
been: process_adjtimex_modes().

process_adjtimex_adj_offset was basically the same as your
ntp_update_offset() function, so I killed it but grabbed the wrong
function name.

> From an userspace perspective it's the core of ntp_adjtime(), so I'd 
> prefer something close to that.

does process_adjtimex_modes(), or ntp_process_adjtimex_modes work for
you?

thanks
-john


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/