[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080316203347.GX95344431@sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 07:33:47 +1100
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc: Milan Broz <mbroz@...hat.com>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: INFO: task mount:11202 blocked for more than 120 seconds
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:58:02AM +0100, Christian Kujau wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Milan Broz wrote:
> >Yes, there is bug in dm-crypt...
> >Please try if the patch here helps: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/3/14/71
>
> Hm, it seems to help the hangs, yes. Applied to today's -git a few hours
> ago, the hangs are gone. However, when doing lots of disk I/O, the machine
> locks up after a few (10-20) minutes. Sadly, netconsole got nothing :(
>
> After the first lockup I tried again and shortly after bootup I got:
False positive. Memory reclaim can inverts the order of iprune_mutex and
the normal inode locking orders. i.e. Both of these are possible:
do_something()
enter memory reclaim
iprune_mutex
inode lock
or
do_something()
inode lock
do_something_else
enter memory reclaim
iprune_mutex
inode lock on different inode
So depending on what is seen first (in this case the first), the second
will trip lockdep. Neither are a deadlock, because the inode lock
held before memory reclaim is a referenced inode and will *never* be
on the free list for memory reclaim to deadlock on....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists