[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080317131345.GB17307@duck.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:13:45 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add possibly missing iput() when quotaon and
quotaoff races
On Thu 13-03-08 14:42:11, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:05:52 +0100
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> > We should always put inode we have reference to, even if quota was reenabled
> > in the mean time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >
> > ---
> > dquot.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/dquot.c b/fs/dquot.c
> > index f816d06..24eef58 100644
> > --- a/fs/dquot.c
> > +++ b/fs/dquot.c
> > @@ -1522,8 +1522,8 @@ int vfs_quota_off(struct super_block *sb, int type)
> > truncate_inode_pages(&toputinode[cnt]->i_data, 0);
> > mutex_unlock(&toputinode[cnt]->i_mutex);
> > mark_inode_dirty(toputinode[cnt]);
> > - iput(toputinode[cnt]);
> > }
> > + iput(toputinode[cnt]);
> > mutex_unlock(&dqopt->dqonoff_mutex);
> > }
> > if (sb->s_bdev)
> This one looks like 2.6.25 material?
Yes, this can be nasty when triggered (Busy inodes after umount) and the
patch is safe.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists