[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080317173021.28e6fd97@core>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:30:21 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Nebojsa Miljanovic <neb@...atel-lucent.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kittlitz, Edward (Ned)" <nkittlitz@...atel-lucent.com>,
asweeney@...atel-lucent.com,
"Polhemus, William (Bart)" <bpolhemus@...atel-lucent.com>
Subject: Re: SO_REUSEADDR not allowing server and client to use same port
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:43:28 -0500
Nebojsa Miljanovic <neb@...atel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Alan,
> thanks. With that additional INFO, I was able to find detailed description of
> this denial of service attack (attached below).
> Just to clarify. Having this port re-use check prevents folks from launching
> this attack as opposed to being victim of it?
Different issue. I can hijack a connection.
Imagine I have a server bound to *.5000, and someone is about to connect.
If on the server box I am able to bind and issue a connect outwards
matching the inbound connection I will get the connection not the server.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists