[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080317183047.GA188@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:30:47 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, ego@...ibm.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, tytso@...ibm.com, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, josh@...edesktop.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, niv@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix misplaced mb() in rcu_enter/exit_nohz()
On 03/16, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> In the process of writing up the mechanical proof of correctness for the
> dynticks/preemptable-RCU interface, I noticed misplaced memory barriers
> in rcu_enter_nohz() and rcu_exit_nohz().
Can't comment this patch, there is no rcu_enter_nohz() in my rcupreempt.h ;)
I'm not sure the code below is up to date, but what I have in
arch/s390/kernel/time.c is:
stop_hz_timer:
cpu_set(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
if (rcu_needs_cpu(cpu) || local_softirq_pending()) {
cpu_clear(cpu, nohz_cpu_mask);
return;
}
Don't we need smp_mb() after cpu_set() ?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists