[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803171152y379560dfp1296aefb0b86b54b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:52:43 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [11/18] Fix alignment bug in bootmem allocator
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > only happen when align is large than alignment of node_boot_start.
>
> Here's an updated version of the patch with this addressed.
> Please review. The patch is somewhat more complicated, but
> actually makes the code a little cleaner now.
>
> -Andi
>
>
> Fix alignment bug in bootmem allocator
>
>
> Without this fix bootmem can return unaligned addresses when the start of a
> node is not aligned to the align value. Needed for reliably allocating
> gigabyte pages.
>
> I removed the offset variable because all tests should align themself correctly
> now. Slight drawback might be that the bootmem allocator will spend
> some more time skipping bits in the bitmap initially, but that shouldn't
> be a big issue.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
>
how about create local node_boot_start and node_bootmem_map that make
sure node_boot_start has bigger alignment than align input.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists