[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440803171427y7c9b2a54nacb0603916713033@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:27:21 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pj@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [11/18] Fix alignment bug in bootmem allocator
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:56 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > > only happen when align is large than alignment of node_boot_start.
> >
> > Here's an updated version of the patch with this addressed.
> > Please review. The patch is somewhat more complicated, but
> > actually makes the code a little cleaner now.
> >
> > -Andi
> >
> >
> > Fix alignment bug in bootmem allocator
> >
> >
> > Without this fix bootmem can return unaligned addresses when the start of a
> > node is not aligned to the align value. Needed for reliably allocating
> > gigabyte pages.
> >
> > I removed the offset variable because all tests should align themself correctly
> > now. Slight drawback might be that the bootmem allocator will spend
> > some more time skipping bits in the bitmap initially, but that shouldn't
> > be a big issue.
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> >
> how about create local node_boot_start and node_bootmem_map that make
> sure node_boot_start has bigger alignment than align input.
please check it
YH
View attachment "offset_alloc_bootmem_v2.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (4834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists