[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803161942.01944.phillips@phunq.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:42:01 -0800
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ramback: faster than a speeding bullet
On Sunday 16 March 2008 18:31, David Newall wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > The UPS provides a guarantee of commit to stable storage. No amount of
> > FUD will change that.
>
> What about system crashes? They guarantee that data will be lost. I
Not if it is mirrored and replicated. Also nice if crashes are very
rare, which they are unless you work at it.
> know opinions are divided on the subject of crashes: You say Linux
> doesn't; everybody else says it does. I side with experience. (It does.)
I say it does not crash often, to the point where I have not seen it
crash once for any reason I did not create myself (I tend to wait for
the occasional brown bag release to fade away before shifting development We do get quite a few
reports of less mature systems like hald and usb causing problems, and
not too long ago NFS client was very crash happy. I did see some of
those myself two years ago, and fixed them.
On the whole, Linux is very reliable. Very very reliable. Now mirror
that, replicate it, add in 2 x 2 redundant power supplies backed by
independent UPS units so you can do regular preemptive maintenance on
the batteries, and you have a sweet enterprise transaction processing
system. All set for a faster than light moon shot :-)
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists