lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:12:39 -0600
From:	Joe Peterson <joe@...rush.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Interactivity degrades with CONFIG_[FAIR]_GROUP_SCHED set in 2.6.24
 and later

First of all, I am very excited to see the CFS in the kernel.
Interactivity is really great; much better than before.

When going from kernel 2.6.23 to 2.6.24, however, I noticed that
interactivity (namely the smoothness of mouse motion) was noticeably
less smooth under load.  The most obvious case was while pulling down a
Subversion repository; the mouse would freeze for quite long periods
while being moved (i.e. a large fraction of a second), which never
happens under 2.6.23.  I was using ZFS-FUSE on the partition I was
writing to, and it uses a lot of CPU at times, but 2.6.23 seems to
handle it better.

After reading many posts on similar sounding issues, I decided to try
getting later versions of the kernel: 2.6.25-rc5 and the latest 2.6.25
from the git archive (as of yesterday, 3/16) in case recent patches
addressed this.  They both still exibit the issue, however.

I then tried compiling without CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED (which also turned off
CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED and a number of other options), and the behavior
seems to be back to the (better) 2.6.23 performance, at least has far as
what I can tell from my tests.

After playing around with the later kernels with CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED
enabled, I noticed a number of random times the mouse was not smooth and
seemed to not be getting an "interactive" amount of CPU time, but I have
a couple of tasks that repeat the problem reliably, so if there is any
debug information I can provide, please let me know, and I'll be glad to
help out in any way I can.

					Thanks, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ