lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080318001720.9b6aea83.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:17:20 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.6.25-rc5-mm1][regression?] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU, modprobe

On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:25:26 +0900 KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I found strange message at 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 booting.
> and it is always reproduce.
> 
> 
> and, Eric Piel's spinlock related patch(below URL) can't fixed my problem.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120561027011749&w=2
> 
> Is this known bug?
> or should i do bisect?
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#3, udevd/2495
>  lock: a040000058246510, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: udevd/2495, .owner_cpu: 2
> 
> Call Trace:
>  [<a000000100015f00>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0
>                                 sp=e00001609262fbd0 bsp=e000016092620fd8
>  [<a000000100015f50>] dump_stack+0x30/0x60
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620fc0
>  [<a0000001004674a0>] spin_bug+0x1a0/0x1c0
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f90
>  [<a000000100467590>] _raw_spin_unlock+0xd0/0x120
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f60
>  [<a00000010082bfe0>] _spin_unlock+0x20/0x40
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620f40
>  [<a000000100138100>] do_wp_page+0x500/0xfe0
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620ed8
>  [<a00000010013c560>] handle_mm_fault+0xe80/0x10e0
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620e50
>  [<a00000010006c140>] ia64_do_page_fault+0x600/0xa40
>                                 sp=e00001609262fda0 bsp=e000016092620df0
>  [<a00000010000abe0>] ia64_leave_kernel+0x0/0x270
>                                 sp=e00001609262fe30 bsp=e000016092620df0
> 

I'm unaware of any other reports of anything like this so yes, please do
bisect it if you have the time.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ