[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JbaQk-0005iw-67@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 12:56:34 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: peterz@...radead.org
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/8] mm: rotate_reclaimable_page() cleanup
> > -int rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
> > +void rotate_reclaimable_page(struct page *page)
> > {
> > - struct pagevec *pvec;
> > - unsigned long flags;
> > -
> > - if (PageLocked(page))
> > - return 1;
> > - if (PageDirty(page))
> > - return 1;
> > - if (PageActive(page))
> > - return 1;
> > - if (!PageLRU(page))
> > - return 1;
>
> Might be me, but I find the above easier to read than
>
> > + if (!PageLocked(page) && !PageDirty(page) && !PageActive(page) &&
> > + PageLRU(page)) {
> >
Matter of taste, returning from a middle of a function is generally to
be avoided (unless not). Anyway, this is just a side effect of the
main cleanup, so I think I'm entitled to choose the style I prefer ;)
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists