[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080318.211505.93059628.taka@valinux.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:15:05 +0900 (JST)
From: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@...inux.co.jp>
To: kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Block I/O tracking
Hi,
> > > And, blist seems to be just used for force_empty.
> > > Do you really need this ? no alternative ?
> >
> > I selected this approach because it was the simplest way for the
> > first implementation.
> >
> > I've been also thinking about what you pointed.
> > If you don't mind taking a long time to remove a bio cgroup, it will be
> > the easiest way that you can scan all pages to find the pages which
> > belong to the cgroup and delete them. It may be enough since you may
> > say it will rarely happen. But it might cause some trouble on machines
> > with huge memory.
> >
> Hmm, force_empty itself is necessary ?
It is called when bio cgroups are removed.
With the current implementation, when you delete a bio cgroup,
the bio_cgroup members of page_cgroups which point the cgroup
have to be cleared.
So I'm looking for another way like:
- Use some kind of id instead of a pointer to a bio cgroup,
so you can check whether the id is valid before you use it.
- Don't free the bio cgroup until all the pages referring to
the cgroup.
I also want to implement that if you find a page whose cgroup is
already removed, the page should be assigned to a new cgroup.
Thank you,
Hirokazu Takahashi.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists