[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47DF39FB.7060306@sandeen.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:41:47 -0500
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: hch@...radead.org, andi@...stfloor.org, byron.bbradley@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS Fails Quality Assurance Tests on ARM
David Miller wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:54:18 +0000
>
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:47:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> There was a patch floating around to "fix" it but it's not on-disk
>>> compatible w/ x86 & friends, it just makes things consistent for arm. I
>>> think packing some of these structures would take care of it, but this
>>> problem could use some attention & testing I think, it's been floating
>>> around a long time.
>> Do you have a pointer to that patch? Once the unaliged fields are
>> identified simply using get_unaligned on them should fix this issue.
>
> True, but there is the tertiary issue that the packing done by these
> platforms might mean that the on-disk format is different on different
> platforms which the XFS folks likely want to avoid if possible.
Right.
FWIW, this patch should fix up at least the most egregious problems, and
in fact I think most likely resolves the whole issue with the old arm
ABI, though for some reason, qemu issues keep me from getting a whole
xfstests QA run to complete....
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00151.html
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists