[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1205945455.2489.18.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:50:54 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 31] x86: unification and xen updates
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 08:11 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 16:36 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Ingo,
> >>
> >> This is a great big pile of x86 unification and Xen bugfix patches.
> >> They build and boot for me on 64-bit and 32-bit (PAE and non-PAE).
> >>
> >
> > FWIW I tested in a PAE Xen guest on 32 and 64 bit h/v and it was fine
> > including running ddcprobe which was my most recent issue. I can't see
> > why this would fix it though.
> >
>
> I'm actually having problem booting 32-on-64 hvm guests. Specifically
> the Fedora installer crashes fairly early on:
[snip]
>
> Seen anything like that?
I practically never boot HVM Linux guests of any sort so no.
> > I thought for a second when you said it booted on 64 bit you meant 64
> > bit Xen guest, do you know how that stuff is going?
> >
>
> Last I heard, they got something booting, but it wasn't very clean. I
> need to resync with Eduardo. A lot of these changes were intended to
> make that effort easier, but it would be nice to confirm ;) Doesn't
> look like http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=xen-pvops-64.git;a=summary has
> changed much lately.
Thanks, will keep an eye on that tree.
>
> J
>
--
Ian Campbell
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way.
-- Henry Spencer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists