lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0803182248390.8851@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:48:49 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not allow setting of quota limits to too high
 values


On Mar 18 2008 17:44, Jan Kara wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For 2.6.26, I assume?  I am not able to determine the seriousness of this
>>>> problem from the changelog nor from the patch itself.
>>>
>>>  Not really serious. Nobody complained so far (i.e., for the time quota
>>> exists) and the limits will just wrap when you try to set them over 4TB
>>> now. So the patch can wait...
>> So does quota_v2.c even handle quotas > 4 TB?
>  Usage yes, limits no. But some Sun guys are already working on a patch
> for fully 64-bit quota. I already have a decent kernel patch from him but
> I'd like to see also tools support to really run it before merging the
> patch :).

Does this also affect XFS?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ