[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080319145448.GA26416@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:54:48 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6 (was Re: Suspend and hibernation
patchset against -rc6)
On Wed 2008-03-19 07:47:06, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Ok, 7c0... is innocent. Reverting not only the mdelay, but also rest
> > of drivers/acpi/ec.c patch fixed the
> > "rc6-breaks-backlight-in-X-over-lid-close", good.
>
> Can you clarify a bit?
>
> Do you mean that the full revert of 2c81ce4 that already got committed is
> sufficient for you, or do you need to totally undo everything we've done
> to ec.c since -rc5, and thus also to revert the _other_ revert we did (in
> 4af8e10a6c57e7292862bd1703712f0565c7e429)?
I believe that current mainline is okay, and will test that theory
shortly.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists