[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080318225201.GA2115@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:52:03 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6 (was Re: Suspend and hibernation
patchset against -rc6)
On Tue 2008-03-18 10:31:28, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > On Tue 2008-03-18 14:06:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > >
> > > Confirmed, suspend slowness is in 2.6.25-rc6, too. It takes 15 seconds
> > > to suspend/resume, while 2.6.24 takes 9. Thinkpad x60.
> >
> > IIRC 2.6.25-rc5 was "fast".
>
> Can you bisect it? There's only 343 commits between -rc5 and -rc6,
> so it
It will take a while. My .git directory is 7G, and I'd like to do a
backup before playing with git.
git gc does not exist here, so I guess I need to update git, too :-(.
> should not take too long to check which commit it is. Even if it should
> take 9 reboots to bisect it entirely, going just five or six will likely
> narrow it down sufficiently that we can probably guess fairly well what
> it's about.
Hmm, it gets weirder. 2.6.25-rc5 was fast, and had small problem with
backlight hotkeys did not work.
2.6.25-rc6 has backlight hotkeys somehow working, but closing/opening lid in X
kills the backlight, making machine unusable.
Hmm...
commit 7c0ea45be4f114d85ee35caeead8e1660699c46f
tree 0822ef23606a733e00bbf75d3e218b1e92abdd78
parent 2f44bbb495dd3e6d0209eff2257438ab9c570e5b
author Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com> Tue, 11 Mar 2008 16:56:47
+0800
committer Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com> Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:20:19
-0400
ACPI: Ignore _BQC object when registering backlight device
According to acpi spec , the objects of _BCL and _BCM are
required if
integrated LCD is present and supports brightness level .The _BQC
is
the optional object. So the _BQC object is ignored when the
backlight device
is registered in ACPI video driver.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10206
Signed-off-by: Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
when did this go in? Pretty recently, right? And that means that ACPI
backlight driver is now used on machines where it was not used
before...?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
pomozte zachranit klanovicky les: http://www.ujezdskystrom.info/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists