[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080319111608.GI10722@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:16:08 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linuxram@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6] vfs: pnode cleanup
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:26:43PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Move set_mnt_shared from pnode.h to pnode.c. Change
> CLEAR_MNT_SHARED() to clear_mnt_shared() function, and move to
> pnode.c.
I don't see why these two are a cleanup, actually.
> @@ -89,20 +100,18 @@ static int do_make_slave(struct vfsmount
> list_for_each_entry(slave_mnt, &mnt->mnt_slave_list, mnt_slave)
> slave_mnt->mnt_master = master;
> list_move(&mnt->mnt_slave, &master->mnt_slave_list);
> - list_splice(&mnt->mnt_slave_list, master->mnt_slave_list.prev);
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave_list);
> + list_splice_init(&mnt->mnt_slave_list,
> + master->mnt_slave_list.prev);
Umm... OK.
> } else {
> - struct list_head *p = &mnt->mnt_slave_list;
> - while (!list_empty(p)) {
> - slave_mnt = list_first_entry(p,
> + while (!list_empty(&mnt->mnt_slave_list)) {
> + slave_mnt = list_first_entry(&mnt->mnt_slave_list,
How is that better?
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mnt->mnt_slave_list);
Fine by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists