[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0803191057270.4958-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Kexec Mailing List <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH -mm] kexec jump -v9
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> writes:
> > Could it be connected with the way the boot kernel hands control over
> > to the image kernel? Presumably ACPI isn't prepared to deal with that
> > sort of thing during a boot from S5. It would have to be fooled into
> > thinking the two kernels were one and the same.
>
> It should be easy to test if it is a hand over problem, by turning off
> the laptop by placing it in S5 (shutdown -h now) and then booting same
> kernel again.
? Doesn't this happen every time Rafael turns the computer off and
then turns it back on?
Do you mean that Rafael should do an S5-type hibernate, but then reboot
in such a way that the image isn't loaded and resumed?
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists