[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200803192147.08942.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:47:07 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6 (was Re: Suspend and hibernation patchset against -rc6)
On Wednesday, 19 of March 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >>> Ok, 7c0... is innocent. Reverting not only the mdelay, but also rest
> >>> of drivers/acpi/ec.c patch fixed the
> >>> "rc6-breaks-backlight-in-X-over-lid-close", good.
> >> Can you clarify a bit?
> >>
> >> Do you mean that the full revert of 2c81ce4 that already got committed is
> >> sufficient for you, or do you need to totally undo everything we've done
> >> to ec.c since -rc5, and thus also to revert the _other_ revert we did (in
> >> 4af8e10a6c57e7292862bd1703712f0565c7e429)?
> >
> > I did some more testing, and realized I was wrong. We need to totally
> > undo everything we've done to ec.c since -rc5... (that has small
> > sideffect of brightness up/down keys no longer working -- regression
> > since 2.6.24, but saves us from "backlight gone after
> > closing/reopening lid" which is _NASTY_ regression from 2.6.25-rc5).
> >
> > ACPI sucks.
> >
> > I.e. this patch:
> >
> >
> > Revert ec.c to 2.6.25-rc5 state:
> >
> > * this fixes backlight after closing/reopening the lid while in X on
> > thinkpad x60
> >
> > * unfortunately it breaks fn-home/end keyboard brightness control
> It should also break volume up/down/mute keys. Essentially all the keys on Thinkpad.
> And it would also be regression to 2.6.24 level.
Well, and what's the underlying issue?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists