[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080319134813.GA25197@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:48:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: VolanoMark performance improvements (was: Re: volanoMark 12%
regression with 2.6.25-rc6)
i just tried a handful of kernels with VolanoMark on an Intel quad-core
testbox, using java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-0.4.b06.fc9.
The result: v2.6.25 is the fastest ever Linux kernel in VolanoMark
testing, -rc7-to-be is ~41% faster than v2.6.24.2, and ~59% faster than
v2.6.21, in this Java benchmark:
v2.6.25-rc7-to-be:
Average throughput = 145613 messages per second
Average throughput = 142569 messages per second
Average throughput = 144963 messages per second
Average throughput = 144998 messages per second
Average throughput = 144213 messages per second
Average throughput = 144491 messages per second
v2.6.24.2:
Average throughput = 101351 messages per second
Average throughput = 99247 messages per second
Average throughput = 101155 messages per second
Average throughput = 103905 messages per second
Average throughput = 98345 messages per second
Average throughput = 102775 messages per second
v2.6.21:
Average throughput = 87630 messages per second
Average throughput = 91366 messages per second
Average throughput = 91317 messages per second
Average throughput = 91317 messages per second
Average throughput = 91359 messages per second
Average throughput = 92116 messages per second
these numbers are totally reproducible when running them over a long
time, i only included 6 runs for brevity. (A sidenote: the
/proc/sys/kernel/compat_sched_yield switch of 0 or 1 has no effect on
the .25-rc7 results, and it degraded the .24 results by about 35% so i
kept it off there.)
so i can see no 12% regression at all - but i have not tried all the
zillions of older, binary-only Java distributions.
So, to make the tests comparable, and to make some progress on this
matter, could you please try java-1.6.0-openjdk - what kind of
VolanoMark numbers do you get with it? If you still see a regression
with an open Java package too then could you please send me the .config
of your test-kernel? Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists