[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E18099.5060100@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:07:37 +0300
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@...e.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: suspend slow in 2.6.25-rc6 (was Re: Suspend and hibernation patchset
against -rc6)
Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2008-03-19 23:35:10, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>>> Ok, 7c0... is innocent. Reverting not only the mdelay, but also rest
>>>>> of drivers/acpi/ec.c patch fixed the
>>>>> "rc6-breaks-backlight-in-X-over-lid-close", good.
>>>> Can you clarify a bit?
>>>>
>>>> Do you mean that the full revert of 2c81ce4 that already got committed is
>>>> sufficient for you, or do you need to totally undo everything we've done
>>>> to ec.c since -rc5, and thus also to revert the _other_ revert we did (in
>>>> 4af8e10a6c57e7292862bd1703712f0565c7e429)?
>>> I did some more testing, and realized I was wrong. We need to totally
>>> undo everything we've done to ec.c since -rc5... (that has small
>>> sideffect of brightness up/down keys no longer working -- regression
>>> since 2.6.24, but saves us from "backlight gone after
>>> closing/reopening lid" which is _NASTY_ regression from 2.6.25-rc5).
>>>
>>> ACPI sucks.
>>>
>>> I.e. this patch:
>>>
>>>
>>> Revert ec.c to 2.6.25-rc5 state:
>>>
>>> * this fixes backlight after closing/reopening the lid while in X on
>>> thinkpad x60
>>>
>>> * unfortunately it breaks fn-home/end keyboard brightness control
>> It should also break volume up/down/mute keys. Essentially all the keys on Thinkpad.
>> And it would also be regression to 2.6.24 level.
>
> As I explained above.
>
> Unfortunately, applying this means I loose screen as soon as I
> close/reopen lid. 2.6.24 did not behave like that. And it makes my
> machine mostly unusable -- as soon as you try to carry it away, you
> loose video. BAD.
> Pavel
>
Pavel,
You are reverting a revert of the patch, which was introduced _after_ 2.6.24.
Thus, you regression to 2.6.24 should lay somewhere else.
Regards,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists