[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47E0FC47.8040902@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:43:03 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Volker Armin Hemmann <volker.armin.hemmann@...clausthal.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24.X: SATA/AHCI related boot delay. - not with 2.6.24.3
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 19. März 2008, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> x UDMA/133 abar m8192@...9dfc000 port 0xf9dfc200
>>
>>> irq 315
>>> [ 38.125479] ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m8192@...9dfc000 port
>>> 0xf9dfc280 irq 315
>>> [ 38.597035] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>>> [ 38.597732] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1600JS-00MHB1, 10.02E01, max
>>> UDMA/133 [ 38.597775] ata1.00: 312581808 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
>>> [ 38.598405] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>>> [ 39.069342] ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
>>> [ 39.084225] ata2.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-12, max UDMA7
>>> [ 39.084264] ata2.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48 NCQ (depth
>>> 0/32) [ 39.086268] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>> So, just to confirm. With the updated patch, you don't see any problem,
>> right?
>
> Correct. With the updated patch I don't see problems in 'non-raid' mode. AHCI
> mode still has problems without nosmi. But that is an entirely different
> problem, right?
Yeap, can you please post the result of "lspci -nn"?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists